A couple of weeks ago, I asked founders about the most expensive lessons they'd learned expanding between the US and Europe.
The responses were pretty eye-opening.
One founder mentioned paying €8k for a market study that completely missed important operational costs. Another spent around 40k on packaging and certifications before realizing demand was nowhere near what their US numbers suggested.
Others brought up unexpected duties, local regulations, localization, working capital, and the difficulty of getting reliable information before committing to a new market.
A recurring theme was that information isn't necessarily hard to find. The problem is knowing what to look for, connecting the dots, and understanding how everything affects the actual business.
I've spent some time turning that feedback into a more structured service, and I'd love to get it challenged before building the whole thing.
The idea
A fixed-scope market entry feasibility assessment for established physical-product and eCommerce brands looking to expand between the US and Europe.
I'm looking at two types of projects:
1. Market Prioritization
For businesses considering multiple countries and trying to figure out where to start.
Rather than treating Europe as one market, we'd compare countries based on demand, competition, pricing, distribution, regulatory barriers, estimated investment, and potential profitability.
The goal is to identify which markets actually justify further investment, rather than simply choosing the biggest or easiest to enter.
2. Market Entry Assessment
For businesses that already have a target country in mind and need to understand what launching there would realistically involve.
The assessment would cover:
Product positioning and differentiation against local competitors.
Demand validation, search trends, seasonality, and marketplace opportunities.
Competitor analysis, including pricing, reviews, estimated sales where reliable data exists, and potential gaps.
Consumer behavior, localization, and product adaptations.
Import costs, product compliance, permits, taxes, and ongoing obligations, with qualified specialists involved where needed.
Distribution options, marketplace fees, logistics, returns, and operational requirements.
Unit economics, pricing, working capital, and break-even scenarios.
A practical go-to-market plan, launch budget, and milestones.
But here's where I think the real value should be.
Instead of delivering a report saying "Germany is an attractive market worth X billion," the client should be able to answer questions like:
What will it actually cost to get my product into Germany and start selling?
What would my margins look like after logistics, marketplace fees, advertising, and returns?
How much capital would I need before reaching break-even?
Are there compliance requirements that could force me to redesign the product?
How much demand would I realistically need to justify the investment?
And what would have to go wrong for this expansion to become a bad decision?
The deliverable would include a written assessment, an editable financial model with different scenarios, a regulatory and operational risk overview, and a practical roadmap.
I'd also include specific stop-or-expand criteria, so a business knows when to invest further and when to reconsider.
I'm planning to test the methodology using my own physical-product brand before offering it commercially.
What I'd really like feedback on
If you've expanded internationally or paid for this kind of research before:
Does this address the problems you actually faced, or am I still missing something important?
Is there anything here you'd consider unnecessary or too generic?
What would you need to see in a report like this to trust the conclusions enough to make an investment decision?
And perhaps most importantly, is this something you'd realistically outsource and pay for, or would you still prefer handling it internally?
I'm especially interested in hearing from people who've previously hired consultants or paid for market research and found it useful, or disappointing.
I'd rather find the weaknesses now than build something nobody needs.