So many people protest last time during Cobbold Commission....majority Sarawakian doesnt agreed with formation of Malaysia

I think most of us should prioritise being Sarawakian first instead of Malaysian, especially when overseas.

Hai, before anyone say this is ragebait, this is not. If this kind of content is not for you, kindly leave. You're not obligated to stay and read.

That being said, let me set the scene...

I have lived in Sarawak since I was 5 or 6 years old. I, despite being a Muslim Malay, enjoyed the diversity of Sarawak. Specifically rural areas. I had a father praying for me and my mom. He 'didn't mind what god would think of him', he just enjoys doing what he thinks is right or would advocate rightness.

I have experienced the development of Sarawak. From some large areas still being only trees, to bald patches of land, to it undergoing urban development. It's not something everyone would experience in the lifetime. I am grateful to be experiencing this all.

However, is Sarawak fully perfect? Not quite.

I wouldn't say it's perfect. But, I wouldn't say it's quite bad either.

I would say it's a unique experience to live in Sarawak years before Tok Nan passed away. It is a unique experience to say Muslims, Christians, Pagans, others get along together. Everybody is very tolerant of each other, it's not something you can see even in 'first world countries'.

As for the laws, I applaud Sarawak for having its own healthcare doctrine, labor doctrine, educational doctrine, and so on. In my opinion, these are way better than what West Malaysian an offer. The best part about Sarawak if you are a Sarawakian? Your job security is basically guaranteed. This state prioritizes people who are citizens of the state itself. There are expatriates, but the Sarawakian government is also pumping out cash in training to make sure a lot of Sarawakians become skilled workers domestically and perhaps internationally.

I however, do feel sad that in some parts this state, racism or xenophobia is still normalized. There are people calling me "tambi" (in a derogatory sense) because I am a Malay with a bit of Indian/Arab mix (I couldn't really tell which) only to shut up when I fully face them as if asking them to repeat. In my experience, speaking for myself here, this feels like the vast majority of the town I live in. Some of these people work in government sector, by the way. I don't know what their problem is because I save energy by minding my own business.

To the people who are about to tell me to leave if I don't like it here, I agree! I don't have any obligation to stay nor would I like to continue troubling myself with visa issues. I won't and wouldn't complain about MA63, so don't twist anything.

Anyway, did I like it here? Most certainly. But sadly, it is time for me to live after being here for 15 years... From a kid with nothing, to an adult with... Nothing still. I wish to return to Sarawak again someday, but only time will tell.

Be safe, and be well, fellow Sarawakians. Thank you for the very fun ride

I recently read about Chong Chieng Jen being suspended from the Sarawak State Assembly until October 21, following his remarks during the 2027 State Budget debate. The motion was passed with 62 votes in favour, 1 against and 1 abstention.

According to the Assembly, Chong had allegedly violated several Standing Orders by making unsubstantiated allegations and using inappropriate language.

However, YB Violet Yong strongly opposed the suspension and raised several concerns.

She argued that:

- Chong was attending Parliament at the time, and the Speaker had already been informed of his parliamentary commitments.

- Proceeding with the suspension motion in his absence denied him the opportunity to defend himself, raising concerns about natural justice.

- Opposition representatives are elected to scrutinise government spending, question policies and hold the government accountable.

- Standing Orders should maintain order in the Assembly, rather than be used to suppress legitimate criticism.

- With GPS holding an overwhelming majority, she questioned whether the government could tolerate criticism from the small number of opposition representatives.

One of her strongest statements was:

"You can suspend an ADUN, but you cannot suspend democracy."

On the other hand, the Assembly's position was that elected representatives must follow Standing Orders and support serious allegations with evidence.

Personally, I'm interested in understanding the democratic and constitutional implications of this incident rather than simply taking sides.

What do you think?

Was the suspension justified under the Standing Orders, or should Chong have been given an opportunity to defend himself before the vote?

And more broadly, how should the Sarawak State Assembly balance parliamentary discipline with the opposition's responsibility to hold the government accountable?

I'd especially like to hear from anyone familiar with Sarawak's parliamentary procedures or constitutional law.

MIRI (Sept 13): “This may be my last time.”

That was the candid message from Premier Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg as he called on the older generation to make way for younger leaders to carry on the responsibility and struggle of Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB).

The PBB president said leadership succession was a natural process and that the party must continuously prepare and train younger members to take over when the time came.

“I’m 76 years old, in four more years I’ll be 80.

“I want to be frank, this may be my last time. We cannot go against nature, even though our hearts may still feel young. Even if we feel young at heart, we cannot go against nature. But I will make the decision when the time comes.

“We are already getting old, and it is time for us to give way to the younger generation to carry on the responsibility and the struggle,” Abang Johari said this in his speech when officiating at the PBB Northern Zone Special Convention at Miri Indoor Stadium here on Sunday.

According to him, the party’s struggle would continue despite changes in its leadership, urging members not to feel disappointed when the time came for them to make way for younger leaders.

“Sometimes we feel disappointed when we are replaced. But this is the law of nature, the old are eventually replaced by the young.

“Leaders come and go. There comes a time when we say thank you and allow new people to take our place. But the spirit of PBB must be carried on by those who love Sarawak.

“What I mean is that we cannot go against nature. But PBB will always be there because we have a system to ensure the continuity of PBB,” he said.

He said the younger generation must be properly trained, not only in leadership but also in dealing with society and people of different backgrounds and religions.

“The successors must be trained, trained in how to communicate with people, how to engage with different communities and how to interact with people of different religions, so that there will be no toxicity,” he said.

Abang Johari said he was grateful to have been trained by leaders before him and believed the same responsibility must now be carried out by the current generation towards younger party members.

He said PBB had already introduced new faces, including young leaders, during the previous election.

“Therefore, those of us who are older should give way to the younger generation,” he said.

This might sound controversial, but I will say this out. We all know that DAP Sarawak gradually losing their support from their traditional votes bank. How I see this, due to them still stuck with 2010s era. Love to flaunt their golden era during that time. But their method to win votes do not augur well with this era, where even their traditional votes bank are not attracted to their manifesto, while the opposing side, iykyk. While more and more people in Sarawak are educated, they started to realise that only Sarawakian defended their own homeland and not controlled by external interests. That’s why you see now, they love to squabble on petty stuffs, but when comes to Petronas vs PETROS, they suddenly fall into silence. I don’t know if you see this, but DAP Sarawak seems to protect the interests of Selangor and Penang (as they contributed most of Malaysia’s economy). Not to mention their behaviour of silenting dissents. Seriously, the more they do that, the more people will speak up. Can’t deny there’s good DAP Sarawak members, but it’s a minority.

I want to know what’s Chinese Sarawakians perspective on DAP Sarawak. I’m seriously curious.

Idk if it's just me, or anyone, but day by day, Sarawak Government gradually distancing themselves from Taib's family. And not to mention, Raghad Kurdi (jeez, I hate her. She's annoying!) is already out of reach from the Government. Taib's family monopoly also gradually fading, with family feuds happened, believe that Sarawak Government intentionally pitting Taib's family against each other. Forget about Jepak Bridge name, that just for recognition only. What else you guys noticed about Sarawak Government distancing themselves from Taib's legacy?

Well I think everyone knew him, and his attack on Sarawak. I guess, Sarawak advancement is a threat for him and his colleagues. And Sarawak PH? They choose to stay silent. Like what Abang Jo used to say, “you challenge me, I challenge you back!”

Hi there fellow redditors, anyone from Kuching interested to have a face to face dialogue with a friendly, easy-going YB? (N13. Batu Kitang YB Lo Khere Chiang) This dialogue will give you a chance to express your concerns and receive candid answers! This event would be casual, you will be able to speak freely without any filter expected from you. If you have any ideas to further the interests of Sarawak, are a patriotic individual, frustrated with the current political situation, or just want to know more about what is currently being done to restore Sarawak’s rights, this dialogue is for you!

It is now more important than ever to voice out your views and to understand more about MA63 and the preceding laws and events. We need momentum and in order to achieve this, Sarawakian’s need to be united and believe in the cause collectively. If you are skeptical then this dialogue would be the perfect opportunity for you to raise your thoughts. Yb Lo is eager to share his vision with you and welcomes all constructive criticism.

As the state election approaches, it’s important for us to have honest and grounded conversations about Sarawak’s political landscape. Many young Sarawakians will be casting their votes for the first time, and they deserve clear, accessible discussions that help them understand the issues, the parties, and the direction our state is heading.

Our goal is simple: to give first-time voters a clearer picture of what’s at stake, what each political side stands for, and how their vote can shape Sarawak’s future. An informed electorate is a stronger electorate — and the future of Sarawak rests in the choices we make together.

Batang Lupar bridge was completed and people all over Sarawak and Malaysia has congratulated it and some felt emotional (in a good way) but I have a question,

To this day, I have not seen DAP Sarawak congratulated or mentioned anything about the bridge. I thought they have said before they want to see development?

Can someone enlighten me on what Taib Mahmud’s actual contributions were that genuinely benefited Sarawak’s growth during his years in power? Cause I am struggling to think of one.

When I read it, I notice most of the phrases I always heard from my manager while I was working. Is this normal at sarawak?

Let’s stop calling Sarawak a “harmonious wilayah.” A more accurate description is that we’re a tolerant wilayah. Those are two completely different things.

The people who keep pushing the “Sarawak is so harmonious” narrative are usually the uncles and aunties on Facebook, whose social circles rarely extend beyond people like themselves. Their idea of harmony is often based on curated social media posts rather than reality. I hardly ever see the younger generation proudly saying, “Sarawak is harmonious.” Most of them are much more careful with their words because they know the situation is more nuanced.

Are we doing better than our friends in Peninsular Malaysia? In some aspects, yes. Are we perfect? Definitely not. But are we as divided as some people claim? Also no. We’re doing reasonably well.

Let’s also stop pretending there aren’t cracks. Tiny racial tension exists, especially with some groups feeling they’re being sidelined by the Sarawak government, even though it is made up of leaders from different ethnic backgrounds. Ignoring these concerns doesn’t create harmony it just buries the problem.

At the same time, if we judge & chasing everything through the lens of race alone, we’ll create the very divisions we claim to be fighting against. That’s a dangerous path.

As a whole, Sarawak is still moving in the right direction. Our economy is growing, foreign investment continues to pour in, and we enjoy strong support from the federal government.
1. Strong financial reserve
2. Booming foreign investment
3. Rapid infrastructure development - bridges, roads
4. Leader in renewable energy - Borneo grid in the making
5. Gaining some MA63 right and still fighting for full.
6. One of Malaysia fastest growing economic with long term plan.
7. Stronger roles in Oil & Gas

Governing a wilayah isn’t like running a private company you can’t simply fire every “bad apple” overnight. Progress takes time, and it requires people to focus on solutions instead of constantly fueling racial narratives.

Sarawak doesn’t need the myth of being “perfectly harmonious.” It just needs to remain tolerant, practical, and willing to improve. That’s far more realistic and far more valuable.

r/sarawak. Whats your take on this?