r/FanTheories • u/Careless-News4387 • 6m ago
FanTheory [The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas] What if Shmuel wanted revenge, but never expected Bruno to die? Spoiler
I recently rewatched The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas and found myself thinking about Shmuel again. I’ve seen an older theory saying that he deliberately planned Bruno’s death. I don’t really buy that. My interpretation is different: what if Shmuel wanted Bruno to experience, even just for a moment, what life was like on his side of the fence but never imagined that both of them would end up dead?
There are a few details in the film that make me think about this.
First, Shmuel had a reason to feel some resentment. Bruno denies knowing him when a soldier confronts them, and soon after Shmuel turns up beaten, with a black eye. He does forgive Bruno, but is it really impossible that some anger stayed behind?
The second point is the one that matters most to me: Shmuel knew where he was. He lived inside the camp. He knew the guards were violent, he had already suffered at their hands, and he understood that prisoners were treated terribly. Bruno didn’t. He was the sheltered son of the camp commandant. He had no real idea what was happening behind that fence.
When Bruno suggests coming inside, Shmuel gives him a vague warning, saying something like “you wouldn’t want to come over here.” But he doesn’t really explain what the soldiers do to prisoners. It’s like knowing a boat is sinking and just telling someone who wants to get on it, “I wouldn’t come over here,” without saying that the boat is sinking.
Then there’s the business with Shmuel’s father. He tells Bruno his father has disappeared, and Bruno offers to help search for him. But think about it: Bruno had never been inside the camp. He didn’t know the place, didn’t know where things were, didn’t know the prisoners. What could he realistically do in a search? Maybe Shmuel was simply desperate. But it’s also possible that the search was a way to persuade Bruno to come inside.
And then there’s the striped uniform. Shmuel gets Bruno a prisoner’s uniform so he can blend in. But it also erases the most obvious difference between Bruno and the people being persecuted inside. If Bruno had been discovered in his normal clothes, maybe someone would have noticed he was an outsider, maybe even the commandant’s son. In the uniform, he becomes almost indistinguishable from the prisoners. And Shmuel knew how badly people wearing that uniform were treated. Bruno didn't.
The scene that bothers me most, though, is when Bruno wants to leave. Once he’s inside the camp, he becomes uncomfortable and says he wants to go home. Instead of encouraging him to leave, Shmuel reminds him that his father is still missing. Bruno feels obligated to keep helping. To me, that’s the strongest part of the theory: Bruno finally realizes something is very wrong and wants to escape, but Shmuel persuades him to stay.
So my idea is this: maybe Shmuel never meant to kill Bruno. Maybe he was still hurt about being betrayed and beaten. Maybe he wanted Bruno to experience, even briefly, what life was like on his side of the fence. Maybe he wanted to frighten him, humiliate him, or make him feel trapped and powerless. But things spiraled completely out of control, far beyond what either child could have anticipated, and both of them ended up dead.
I’m not saying that’s definitely what happened. Shmuel was also a traumatized child desperately searching for his father, and that alone could explain his actions. But the revenge interpretation seems worth discussing, especially because of the uniform and the moment when Bruno tries to leave.
There's also something else about the ending that bothers me, and it's the contrast between Bruno and his sister Gretel. Throughout the film, Gretel becomes increasingly influenced by Nazi ideology. She replaces her dolls with Nazi propaganda, admires the German soldiers, and seems to accept what she's being taught. Bruno, meanwhile, rejects those prejudices through his friendship with Shmuel. Yet by the end, Gretel is alive and Bruno is dead. I know that doesn't mean the film is endorsing Gretel's beliefs, but isn't there a strange irony here? The child who follows the ideology survives, while the one who befriends someone persecuted by it dies. I wonder if the filmmakers realized how differently some viewers might interpret that ending.
What do you think? Is there a scene that clearly contradicts this theory? I’d genuinely like to hear the strongest arguments against it.