.

?

.

First thing that comes to mind is a crane, but there's no space for one, and the ground looks weak and would probably give in (which is reason it fell down in the first place)

.

I don't understand how stealing car tires is a profitable business. They're bulky, heavy, and not exactly easy to transport. On top of that, you can't just sell them at their regular price because nobody is going to pay full price for a set of suspiciously cheap used tires from some random guy.

Who even buys them in large quantities? Car shops aren't going to buy hundreds of tires from a stranger without asking questions, and selling them individually sounds like a lot of work.

Even if you manage to sell everything, how much do you actually make after all that effort? I just don't see how the money you get is worth the risk of getting caught, which seems pretty high to me.

I’m interviewing with them for a store clerk and they will pay me minimum wage

I am old fashioned (because I am old) and I often respond to folks with "yes sir" or "yes ma'am" but I don't want to accidentally misgender someone while actually trying to be respectful.

Is there an honorific that covers the whole spectrum?

If not, can we invent one?

If some people point to the Lindsay Clancy case as evidence that women are too irrational, unstable, or unsafe to vote, why does that logic stop at voting?

If you genuinely believe women are essentially “ticking time bombs” who can’t be trusted to make political decisions, why would you trust women to become pregnant, raise your children, or be primarily responsible for their care? Why would men intentionally have children with women they supposedly believe are that fundamentally unstable?

Obviously, I’m not suggesting women should lose either reproductive or political rights. I’m asking why an extreme individual case is used to argue against women’s political autonomy, while almost nobody making that argument follows their own logic to its much more obvious conclusion about motherhood.

Nobody seems to be saying, “This proves women shouldn’t have children.” And I genuinely wonder why that is.

Edit - Love how almost no one is answering the question at all.

🌎

‎

Here Chappell Roan is wearing a bob hairstyle wig. In the 2nd picture that is her natural hair regular hairstyle.

She has so much natural hair I genuinely don't understand the physics behind it fitting under the wig. Can someone please explain how this works?

.

.

I'll kick it off with Michael McDonald.

.

.

To me it has and will be Kobe.

I understand if it doesn't mean anything, hence being not religious. However, does it mean anything to you, or do you just think to yourself "thanks, but no thanks?" ?

no hate, just genuinely curious!

edit: e.g. you're telling your mate about something (he can't do anythingabout it, let's say it's a health issue), you two talk about it and then he says he's gonna pray for you, situations like that

?