The White House rolled out "Trump TV" as a 24/7 streaming feed immediately after exiling CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, which caused the rest of the White House television pool—even Fox News—to refuse pool duties in solidarity.

Launching a dedicated, branded 24/7 administration channel right as the pool boycott and federal First Amendment lawsuit landed makes the three-day gap look a lot less like a spontaneous reaction to bad coverage and a lot more like a planned transition to an in-house state media broadcast.

What do you think? Coincidence?

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/21/us/politics/trump-television-reporters-cameras.html

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-cost-living-concerns-weigh-gop-midterms

The White House launched "Trump TV: The Essentials Station" a 24/7 unfiltered video stream on YouTube and the official White House app, drawing sharp comparisons to state-run media in countries like North Korea.

I have a question. I used to log into fox news every now and again to see what MAGA was telling the True Believers. Occasionally I might leave a pointed comment or two, but never got banned as far as I know. I did this for years.

A few minutes ago I tried to log in to revile the tRumpers for turning a well-deserved execution into public entertainment. They wouldn't let me log in. Has this happened to other people? Are tRump MAGA folks such moral cowards that they cannot bear to hear any form of criticism?

🔗: https://feminegra.com/british-royal-commentators-spent-eight-years-vilifying-meghan-sussex-over-her-father-where-are-their-apologies/

Just curious. It's because I've noticed some oddities in their reporting on Harris. It seems the most prevalent theme is "Should she run"? Followed closely by some paid contributors claiming they've spoken to whoever they hang out with, who say she shouldn't run. I've seen that on CNN and MSNOW. They never EVER mention Harris without this caveat.